A bitter High Court dispute has broken out between prospective neighbours above the development of a wall at a coastal website within a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes attracted national awareness following an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed family members residence at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of preparing breaches, environmental considerations, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into your courts. The Irish Times post about René Collier as well as the Irish Moments short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what commenced as a neighborhood disagreement has advanced right into a hugely publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building operates at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, find to create their loved ones house. The case happens to be emblematic of broader disputes along Eire’s coastline, wherever growth pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of set up residents. Based on the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being produced by their potential neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted underneath arranging permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally citizens of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their setting up permission by creating a wall past the boundaries in their site, resulting in an encroachment on a Specific Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as such regions are subject to rigid controls less than European and Irish environmental legislation. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have Long lasting ecological repercussions, particularly within a delicate coastal environment for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach of their organizing authorization, and say the wall, which happens to be partially developed, is in the right situation. Their lawful team has characterised the motion being an make an effort to hold off or frustrate a lawful development. The couple accuse litigants of looking for to halt homebuilding so as to maintain their perspective, an allegation which has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal organizing disputes, in which views of the sea are each very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described dramatic efforts by the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded as a result of ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, In keeping with sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Instances. In one account, Rene Collier waded through midsection-substantial water throughout a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations, an image that has considering the fact that develop into emblematic on the intensity with the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were being intended to Collect Visible proof on the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from your sea Irish Times described, describing how the two Adult men entered the water through serious climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm drinking water to photograph the internet site became One of the more hanging descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely famous that such actions have been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall extended into a location influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was becoming encroached upon.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being covered in detail through the nationwide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Periods 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 turned widely searched phrases as readers sought to comprehend the qualifications and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard more submissions on no matter if interim orders need to be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical minute from the authorized timeline.
With the core from the dispute is actually a disagreement above boundaries, organizing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve that the wall, as manufactured, goes further than what was permitted and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has been called meticulous in his evaluation of preparing files, maps, and ailments connected towards the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally stressed that their motion is inspired by issue for environmental defense and adherence to organizing regulation. They reject statements that the situation is about preserving Irish Times article about René Collier A non-public view, insisting as a substitute that it is about guaranteeing that improvement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got described their prolonged-standing connection to the realm as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair merely seeking to develop a spouse and children residence in accordance While using the law. They deny the wall encroaches over a Unique Spot of Conservation and say that every one works are already performed based on Specialist assistance and approved strategies. Their attorneys have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, together with entering The ocean throughout a storm, usually do not change the underlying information.
The case has also raised broader questions on how planning disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute over design of wall at coastal site has become a shorthand description to get a scenario that a lot of observers see as more and more frequent. As sea amounts rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation involving personal land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats has become additional contentious.
The Irish Moments write-up about René Collier mentioned which the businessman had previously been linked to regional advocacy on organizing and environmental problems, nevertheless not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Occasions posting about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how men and women from really different Qualified backgrounds can find them selves aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reviews spell their names, are getting to be synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-high drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the location Irish Occasions and René Collier waded by means of midsection-high water through a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Instances are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both the physical actuality on the coastline as well as symbolic mother nature from the act. For supporters in the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an excessive method.
Because the High Court proceedings keep on, the end result continues to be uncertain. The courtroom will have to establish whether the wall as crafted complies with arranging permission and whether or not any encroachment right into a Exclusive Spot of Conservation has occurred. The authorized arguments are elaborate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and planning disorders. However the human element remains central: neighbours who must Are living alongside each other long following the legal costs are compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of building functions at the site on Dublin Road, Sutton, but the implications of the case extend further than that address. For planners, developers, and citizens alike, the dispute serves being a reminder of the significance of clarity in preparing permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. In addition it underscores how rapidly an area disagreement can escalate when fundamental difficulties like environmental safety and home legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of pure elegance and contested boundaries. The wall for the centre in the dispute stands partly built, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized issues. Regardless of whether it can ultimately be altered, eliminated, or accomplished as prepared will count on the court docket’s findings. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will very likely continue on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to one of the most closely viewed planning disputes in north Dublin in recent years.